Homeopathy World Community

Creating Waves of Awareness

It seems a tad strange to say that something that's normally harmless is what makes it dangerous - but in the case of vaccine adjuvants, that can be the case.

Live vaccines are generally recognized as risky - even in mainstream medicine - because they can cause the disease they're supposed to prevent, and have been known to mutate into virulent forms, as has happened with live virus polio vaccines in Africa (Mutated Polio From Vaccine Is Spreading in Africa).

Therefore, killed virus vaccines are more commonly used. The problem with them is that they aren't particularly effective. To boost their action, adjuvants are added. These are materials of all sorts that seem to have the ability to boost the immune system's sensitivity so that it will develop antibodies to the dead viral agent.

More often nowadays, the situation is even worse than that. Rather than using dead virus, vaccines are made with pieces of viruses. That makes the adjuvants even more important.

The problem is that the adjuvants themselves - and sometimes other substances - can be seen by the immune system as invaders. These substances, all parts of a vaccine, enter the body in an abnormal way by injection. The immune system is already in disarray because of the invasion of vaccines. Abnormal immune system responses are forced on the body, such as drugs like antibiotics, which circumvent the body's immune system, or fever reducers, which suppress the immune system. The immune system loses the ability to distinguish between friend and foe.

So, when an adjuvant is forced into the body via injection, and that substance increases the immune response or lengthens the time of response, the disordered immune system can develop antibodies to the adjuvant. The result of that is autoimmune disorders.

That's why squalene is so dangerous. It's normally found in the body, and is actually a necessary substance for normal body functions. When it's used as an adjuvant, the body can develop antibodies to it, resulting in attacks on its own tissues. (Squalene—Is New Vaccine Additive the Worst Yet?)

The most recent example of an adjuvant-created disease is a new one, called macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF). This disease is acknowledged by mainstream medicine to be caused by the adjuvant, aluminum. (New Neurological Disorder Known to be Caused by Common Vaccine Adju...)

Of course, as is typical, the manner of addressing the issue is to simply stonewall - deny a problem exists and do no research on it. MMF is documented in medical literature as an adjuvant-induced disorder and is noted as being similar to multiple sclerosis, even to the demyelination of nerves.

Since mainstream medicine seems to be hell-bent on pushing these toxins into us and our children, it becomes imperative for us to educate and advise. Frankly, I dread what the future holds for the masses of children who are vaccine-damaged.

Views: 289

Tags: adjuvant, aluminum, squalene, vaccine

Comment by Hans Weitbrecht on December 12, 2009 at 6:13am
Dear Heidi
A timely reminder of the dangers. For more insight see my new blog:

Vaccinations and their side effects
Comment by Heidi Stevenson on December 16, 2009 at 12:44pm
The problem of new viruses is already happening, the result of using weakened live viruses in nasal sprays. It's happening in Africa now.

I think that there's a greater danger. It's in the fact that bits of proteins, some of which may be normal in our bodies, are used. It isn't a new viral disease that concerns me nearly as much as the autoimmune disorders that are resulting. I've written about this recently: Vaccines, Prions, Genetic Modification, Mad Cows, and You

The recent Lancet report about an outbreak of a new neurological disorder in pig-rendering workers documents that the cause is not a virus, but an autoimmune disorder that results from bits of tissue similar to our own that's breathed in, coming into proximity of the brain and resulting in an autoimmune disorder.
Comment by Heidi Stevenson on December 16, 2009 at 6:41pm
Your link expresses an interesting concern, but I think that the groups considered at risk for HIV/AIDS are fairly well explained. It isn't a matter of them being arbitrarily attacked, but rather that their habits make them susceptible. The fact that heterosexuals in Africa and homosexuals in the US are the most likely to be susceptible (not taking drug users into the picture) is easily explained. By chance, the first carrier in the US was a homosexual airline employee. He passed the virus to a large number of other homosexuals in a wide area, and the common practice among homosexuals at that time was multiple partners. So, it's not surprising that they were the primary victims, especially in the early years.

In Africa, it's mostly heterosexuals, and that's been the result of the social systems there.

However, I also find myself concerned with much of what's considered factual regarding HIV/AIDS. I haven't spent the time on it that you have, Dr. Zamora, so can't comment as much. But it seems to me that an easy explanation is being offered by mainstream medicine, but that it doesn't seem to make sense - as you've noted. I recall (but can't bring specifics to mind at the moment) that Gallo, the man who supposedly isolated the HIV virus, really didn't. Do you have info on that?

I don't know what you mean by "polyspecific antibodies". Could you enlighten me?

I've a gut feeling that AIDS isn't a specific disease caused by a specific virus, but don't really know. It strikes me that it's more likely an issue of weakened and damaged immune systems overcome by a host of illnesses - modern-day plague brought about by a deranged society. Do you have any thoughts on that idea?

In terms of homeopathy, of course, it doesn't matter (except in the philosophical sense) because we don't really diagnose. Instead, we prescribe by symptoms. Unfortunately, the AIDS symptoms seem to be massive. I haven't dealt with such a case myself, though would take it as an honor to have the opportunity to be trusted in such a case.

As you can probably see, I tend to distinguish between the everyday practical application of homeopathy and theory/philosophy. I find both quite fascinating, but do try to distinguish between them, and apply theory/philosophy very carefully. After all, we do need to be cautious that we're aware of our own views and prejudices when we see patients!

Thank you, Dr. Zamora, for an interesting discussion.
Comment by Debby Bruck on December 17, 2009 at 3:03am
This has been a big issue on Dr Mercola's website in his discussion of squalene.
Squalene: Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret
Squalene: The Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret Exposed
Study Suggests Link Between Vaccines, Gulf War Illnesses
… of antibodies to squalene in a large percentage of sick veterans vaccinated for Gulf Wa … War contained squalene. … role squalene may play in Gulf

Swine Flu is NOT the Problem -- It is the Vaccine that May Harm or Kill You

Urgent information to protect yourself and your loved ones … get informed before the swine flu vaccine craze comes to your town.
Comment by Debby Bruck on December 17, 2009 at 3:13am
Just How Archaic is the U.S. Vaccine Production System?
squalene -- has been linked to numerous health problems
Comment by Heidi Stevenson on December 17, 2009 at 9:06am
May I add my own article on the subject of squalene? Squalene—Is New Vaccine Additive the Worst Yet?

Comment

You need to be a member of Homeopathy World Community to add comments!

Join Homeopathy World Community

© 2014   Created by Debby Bruck.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...