Boger - Boenninghausen Repertory 1905

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by dr. michelle levan on February 9, 2010 at 1:50pm

I DONT SPEAK NOR WRITE IN GERMAN, SO DOWNLOAD HOLDS NO VALUE FOR ME

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on February 9, 2010 at 2:30pm

Dear Michelle

The repertory actually is in english. try the following links:

http://www.heilpraktiker-klaus-giek.de/Boger/3_BBCR_1905_Repert.pdf
http://www.heilpraktiker-klaus-giek.de/Boger/4_BBCR_1905_Conc.pdf
http://www.heilpraktiker-klaus-giek.de/Boger/5_BBCR_1905_index.pdf

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by sajjadakram on May 6, 2010 at 10:08pm

Hans,
Do you think that this repertory is reliable and is exclusively based on proved data.someone said it is bogus.
Regards.
sajjad.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on May 7, 2010 at 5:17am

Hi Sajjad

I compared the entries with Boenninghausen SRH, TT and the regional repertories and found less than 1% mistakes.
So it reflects accurately Boenninghausen's work, but does not make any refference in how far boenninghausen's own sources are reliable.
Your source may relate to BB2 (1937) which is bogus and unreliable.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by sajjadakram on May 7, 2010 at 10:49am

All the softwares available are loaded with BB2[1937}.I am sorry to say they are misguiding.
sajjad.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by sajjadakram on May 7, 2010 at 10:50am

what to do then?
sajjad.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on May 7, 2010 at 5:27pm

Dear sajjadakram

That's what I suspected for quite some time, that the BB1 simply was never added to the computer programs.

I have it in a print-out and bound in 4 volumes for the past 10 years. I don't use a computer program for repertorisation, -- I do it all by hand. And in some way through 20 years of doing it that way have gained a fairly comprehensive knowledge of the remedies contained in the frequently used rubrics.

It may look time consuming , but in the long run it's much faster than any computer program, as while the case evolves, the rubrics already are run against each other in the brain, so once the case-taking is over, the remedy in more than 90% is clear.

Having this kind of knowledge also shortens the case taking significantly, because after the main complaint is clear I already have it down to a small number of remedies in my head. Then specifically the differentiating factors between competing remedies can be asked for.

My success rate lies well above 90% of cases where i get improvement with the first remedy within a few hours (in acutes) and within 2 - 3 days in chronic situations.

This makes remedy selection a piece of cake in most of the cases.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Lynn Cremona on July 20, 2010 at 4:52pm

Hello Sajjad,
re to:
"Do you think that this repertory is reliable and is exclusively based on proved data.someone said it is bogus."
Regards.
sajjad.
I believe that was George Dimitriadis, you are referring to .
He wrote an article; BOGUS’ BÖNNINGHAUSEN The fundamental flaw in ‘Boger’s Bönninghausen’
you can find a PDF version on the Internet
http://www.vithoulkas.com/files/pdf/Bogus_Boenninghausen.pdf

Lynn

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by dr. michelle levan on February 23, 2010 at 2:22pm

thank you for the information

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by sajjadakram on February 9, 2010 at 2:53pm

Dear Hans,
Thanks for posting the link.I have downloaded the file.It is in english and shall compare with the copy i have.Thanks once again.
Regards,
sajjad.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by DR. ARINDAM DUTTA on February 10, 2010 at 11:19am

Dear Hans,

Thank you for the link.

.................ARINDAM

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by sajjadakram on February 24, 2010 at 1:34pm

Dear Hans,
Where from you got the symptom."Travelling Agg".It is not in BB repertory.
Regards.
sajjad.

▶ Reply to This

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page